Words and Civilisation: “Laid-Back”

“Oh, don’t worry,” my friends say about someone I have yet to meet, “he’s very laid-back.”

Little do they know that that is when I start worrying.

Describe somebody as “laid-back” and I have an inner reaction of tension, irritability and apprehension.  I would far rather be told that someone is “formal”.  At least, then, I know that I am dealing with a wooden or metal object with a well-defined shape and clear-cut edges.  “Laid-back” evokes vague, non-descript mush I have no idea how to pick up or handle.

“Laid-back” is supposed to suggest relaxed, unfussy, unconcerned with minute details.  What is unclear to me, is whether this free for all detachment concerns that person’s business alone, or whether it will also spill – uninvited – onto my territory.  The thing about a “laid-back” attitude, is that it is just as tyrannical as formality – except that you are not allowed to mind it, or rebel against it.  After all, you can try breaking down (or at least bending) the rules of formality but how do you push away a pulp of egg white floating in an oxygen-free cabin?

A formal person will be on time.  If he or she is late, then you have grounds for objection (or gracious forgiveness).  A “laid-back” person will have a more fluid concept of time, so is likely to drift in late (funny how “laid-back” people are never early) totally unaware of the fact that his or her behaviour clearly implies that your time is less valuable than his or hers.   So, on the grounds of his/her diminished responsibility, your right to protest is taken away from you – and so is your freedom to organise your own time how you see fit.  If, however, this person does happen to walk in on the strike of the clock, then you are deprived of the joy to appreciate his or her punctuality, since you do not know if it is a show of respect towards you, or a mere accident of fate.  The same person will forget to pay you back money you lent and hold onto your books for months on end… Sometimes even losing them.

With “laid-back” the boundaries are blurred.  With formality, they are crisp and clear.  The beauty of formality, is that it is a game with well-defined rules which you can use to your advantage.  With “laid-back” you are playing hide-and-seek in No Man’s Land, without a compass.

With “laid-back” we are all on first name terms in a professional environment, where such friendliness often feels just fake and patronising.  We forget the common courtesy of thanking our hosts after a dinner party or a friend for a present.  We wear the same casual clothes day in, day out, whether to work, to a party, or to a West End opening night.  The trouble with “laid-back”, is that it kills the sense of occasion, the sense of the special versus the ordinary.

“Laid-back” bullies you into being friendly, careless and ordinary to an extent beyond your comfort zone – and pretending that you like it.  Paradoxally, formality gives you the freedom – the choice to be informal and when – and only when – it is appropriate, laid-back.

Scribe Doll

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Words and Civilisation and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Words and Civilisation: “Laid-Back”

  1. adrian hallchurch says:

    Think you’re confusing ‘laid back’ with ‘lazy’, ‘rude’ and ‘inconsiderate’ (formal people are prone to these things, too) , but maybe his chance has gone already! Meet him with an open heart rather than worry, apprehension and irritability. Good luck xx …..

    • scribedoll says:

      Er… This isn’t a specific person. It’s just how people often describe other people. I’m not meeting anyone specific. Sorry! But thanks for wishing me luck, anyway.

  2. Mark Stanford says:

    I love this piece – none of your objections to laid-back people would be a problem if you yourself were laid-back! If a laid-back person is late to meet another laid-back person, it doesn’t bother them 🙂 But I do agree with Adrian that perhaps laid-back can be confused with inconsiderate…they are not ALWAYS one and the same. x

    • scribedoll says:

      No. I am not – nor have ever been – laid-back. I am not confusing “laid-back” with “inconsiderate”. I just find, in my experience, that very often when people are described to me as “laid-back” they tend to be somewhat inconsiderate towards my time and my things. I find their assumption that I shouldn’t mind just because they don’t, slightly disrespectful. In fact, the very expression “laid-back” evokes the picture of someone sprawled on a sofa, looking down their faces at you because they are far too laid-back to sit up straight and look at you in the eye. There! Am I grumpy enough? :–) x

      • adrian hallchurch says:

        Ha ha! I would never describe you as ‘laid back’ Scribedoll!
        Nor me – though inconsiderate, rude, late, bad-mannered …… I probably am!!

      • scribedoll says:

        Nobody is asking you to. As for you – well – I guess the it all hangs on whether you remember to bring my book back tonight :–)

  3. Gill says:

    I very much enjoyed reading this and I couldn’t agree more!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s